The upcoming fight between Ryan Garcia and Rolando “Rolly” Romero, scheduled for May at Times Square, has stirred considerable controversy within the boxing community. With records of 24-1 (20 KOs) for Garcia and 16-2 (13 KOs) for Romero, the boxing world is set to witness a bout for the WBA’s secondary welterweight title. However, neither fighter is ranked among the top 15 contenders in the welterweight division by any of the major sanctioning bodies. This raises a critical question: why is a world title fight even happening between two unranked boxers?
The failure of sanctioning bodies like the WBA to streamline championship titles is becoming more apparent with fights like this. The WBA had previously indicated intentions to reduce titles in each weight class but seems to be clinging to the notion of a secondary title, despite widespread criticism. This practice dilutes the legitimacy of the title itself, making it less meaningful for fighters and fans alike. Social media reactions have labeled this situation as “disgusting,” indicating a serious disconnect between what boxing enthusiasts expect from championship fights and what is being offered.
When analyzing the merits of this matchup, we must evaluate whether either fighter truly deserves a title shot at this level. Ryan Garcia recently completed a year-long suspension for a doping violation linked to Ostarine, a performance-enhancing drug. This cloud hangs over his head and raises questions about the integrity of the matchup. On the other hand, Romero’s recent knockout loss last year leaves much to be desired in terms of his performance and readiness for a title opportunity. Both fighters have not demonstrated the necessary attributes to earn the right to fight for a belt.
The boxing world would benefit significantly from overhauling its structure of governance. Ideally, unifying the fragmented landscape into a single governing body to award world titles would eliminate confusion and enhance the integrity of the sport. Currently, fights seem more focused on marketing gimmicks than meaningful contests, evidenced by the notion of parading a “fake trinket belt” for a match lacking substantial competitive stakes. It feels disingenuous to label the outcome of Garcia vs. Romero as a championship fight when neither man has done enough to warrant such recognition.
This fight not only reflects poorly on both competitors but also on the broader boxing landscape. The decision to hold a title match involving unqualified fighters sets a damaging precedent. If boxing continues to prioritize marketability over merit, it risks alienating its loyal fanbase. Boxing aficionados crave purity in competition, and the standard for title fights should reflect that. As this controversial matchup approaches, the boxing community is left to ponder its implications: a fight for a secondary title should never eclipse the noble traditions of the sport. Ultimately, the Ryan Garcia vs. Rolando Romero bout may be more of a sign of boxing’s ongoing challenges rather than a celebrated championship event.
Leave a Reply